tom homan

Thomas Douglas Homan (born November 28, 1961) is an American law enforcement officer and political commentator known for his stringent stance on immigration enforcement. Over a career spanning several decades, Homan has held various significant positions within U.S. law enforcement agencies.​

Career Highlights:

  • Early Career: Before joining federal agencies, Homan served as a police officer in his hometown of West Carthage, New York.
  • Border Patrol: In 1984, he joined the U.S. Border Patrol, where he advanced through the ranks, taking on leadership roles and gaining extensive experience in immigration enforcement.​
  • Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE): Homan served as the acting director of ICE from January 2017 to June 2018 during the Trump administration. His tenure was marked by a significant increase in deportation arrests and the implementation of policies such as making immigration arrests at courthouses and detaining pregnant women.
  • Border Czar: In November 2024, President Donald Trump appointed Homan as the “border czar” for his second term, entrusting him with overseeing border security and immigration enforcement efforts.

Recent Developments:

Homan has been at the center of controversy regarding deportation policies. In March 2025, he defended the administration’s decision to deport migrants to El Salvadoran prisons, asserting that all deportees were members of the Venezuelan Tren de Aragua gang.

This stance came under scrutiny following a court order from U.S. District Judge James Boasberg to halt such deportations, raising questions about due process and the application of the Alien Enemies Act.

Despite legal challenges, Homan vowed to continue deportations, stating, “I don’t care what the judges think.” He argued that the administration’s actions were justified and within legal boundaries, even as critics contended that the use of the Alien Enemies Act was inappropriate without an official declaration of war.

Homan’s approach has drawn both support and criticism. Supporters commend his tough stance on illegal immigration and national security, while opponents raise concerns about the legal and ethical implications of his policies.